<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The two faces of Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/</link>
	<description>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of an unnecessary blog, or prohibiting the free posting therein.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spcoon</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>spcoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=33#comment-62</guid>
		<description>anyone who *truly* votes for a candidate based on family values doesn&#039;t watch the family guy. liberals that watch tv are greater in numbers than liberals that vote, so i don&#039;t doubt for a second that the news/entertainment dichotomy at fox exists.

and joel is right about murdoch. he&#039;s only conservative because he understands that in order to make money in american business (at least when he got his start), you&#039;d better sleep and support the power elite network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone who *truly* votes for a candidate based on family values doesn&#8217;t watch the family guy. liberals that watch tv are greater in numbers than liberals that vote, so i don&#8217;t doubt for a second that the news/entertainment dichotomy at fox exists.</p>
<p>and joel is right about murdoch. he&#8217;s only conservative because he understands that in order to make money in american business (at least when he got his start), you&#8217;d better sleep and support the power elite network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=33#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel, thanks for the reply. I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right about Murdoch for the most part. The bottom line, monetarily, is probably very important to him. I&#039;m questioning more the fact that the viewers seem to have no problem with this juxtaposition. Conservative religious groups will boycott Disney at the drop of a hat, but keep watching Fox News despite this sort of programming? It just seems strange to me. 

Another thing -- and this is pure speculation -- is that I wonder who is watching this un-family programming? I have a hard time believing that the the conservatives are tuning in solely for the news, and then the liberals take over to watch these tv shows. How many red state &quot;values&quot; voters are supporting this sort of programming with their eyeballs? Again, I&#039;m not claiming they are, I just wonder if that might be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel, thanks for the reply. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right about Murdoch for the most part. The bottom line, monetarily, is probably very important to him. I&#8217;m questioning more the fact that the viewers seem to have no problem with this juxtaposition. Conservative religious groups will boycott Disney at the drop of a hat, but keep watching Fox News despite this sort of programming? It just seems strange to me. </p>
<p>Another thing &#8212; and this is pure speculation &#8212; is that I wonder who is watching this un-family programming? I have a hard time believing that the the conservatives are tuning in solely for the news, and then the liberals take over to watch these tv shows. How many red state &#8220;values&#8221; voters are supporting this sort of programming with their eyeballs? Again, I&#8217;m not claiming they are, I just wonder if that might be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=33#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Dear PotatoStew, 

Fox broadcasting is the premier example of &quot;conservative hypocrisy&quot; often thrown back into the faces of conservative folk whenever they talk about the &quot;smut&quot; on TV....I am not saying you&#039;re doing this. The fact is, it is true. Rupert Murdoch will do whatever he needs to do to make money. He will run a conservative news show and very smutty TV shows - whatever works, and give big checks to whatever politicians he needs to give checks to. But, when there is a lot of complaining about the smut that is on TV, well then the ACLU jumps in, and it&#039;s all about freedom of speech. It seems like a &quot;conspiracy&quot; of the right AND the left to diminish our culture and lower our shared values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear PotatoStew, </p>
<p>Fox broadcasting is the premier example of &#8220;conservative hypocrisy&#8221; often thrown back into the faces of conservative folk whenever they talk about the &#8220;smut&#8221; on TV&#8230;.I am not saying you&#8217;re doing this. The fact is, it is true. Rupert Murdoch will do whatever he needs to do to make money. He will run a conservative news show and very smutty TV shows &#8211; whatever works, and give big checks to whatever politicians he needs to give checks to. But, when there is a lot of complaining about the smut that is on TV, well then the ACLU jumps in, and it&#8217;s all about freedom of speech. It seems like a &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; of the right AND the left to diminish our culture and lower our shared values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=33#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Good point about Married with Children. Seems that Fox has been risking cognitive dissonance in its viewers for some time now. I haven&#039;t really seen any of those four shows either... just a half episode of American Dad once, which didn&#039;t seem all that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about Married with Children. Seems that Fox has been risking cognitive dissonance in its viewers for some time now. I haven&#8217;t really seen any of those four shows either&#8230; just a half episode of American Dad once, which didn&#8217;t seem all that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/10/20/the-two-faces-of-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=33#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that Arrested Development didn&#039;t make the top four.  But then again, I haven&#039;t seen the others except for Family Guy.

I noticed this trend back when Married with Children was on.  Except that with some people I knew, it seemed more like a reality show at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that Arrested Development didn&#8217;t make the top four.  But then again, I haven&#8217;t seen the others except for Family Guy.</p>
<p>I noticed this trend back when Married with Children was on.  Except that with some people I knew, it seemed more like a reality show at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

