<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Essence of Christmas?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/</link>
	<description>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of an unnecessary blog, or prohibiting the free posting therein.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plead the First &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Christmas Letter From Jesus</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-18607</link>
		<dc:creator>Plead the First &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Christmas Letter From Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=60#comment-18607</guid>
		<description>[...] My thoughts on the subject, from last year: Here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My thoughts on the subject, from last year: Here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SUe</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>SUe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=60#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I thought the place to put Christ back into Christmas was called &quot;church.&quot; But I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the place to put Christ back into Christmas was called &#8220;church.&#8221; But I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyd</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>David Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=60#comment-131</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The essence of Christmas&lt;/strong&gt;

PotatoStew posts about some group, somewhere boycotting Sears and Target for not using the word &#039;Christmas&#039; enough in advertising.  

That about does i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The essence of Christmas</strong></p>
<p>PotatoStew posts about some group, somewhere boycotting Sears and Target for not using the word &#8216;Christmas&#8217; enough in advertising.  </p>
<p>That about does i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=60#comment-130</guid>
		<description>My pleasure. Even ignoring the point that groups such as the AFA are actually working against the spirit of Christmas by insisting on linking it with crass commercialization, it seems like a weak reason for a boycott anyway. It&#039;s not as though the omission of the word &quot;Christmas&quot; is actively hurting anybody. Boycott someplace because they make use of sweatshop labor, or exploit their employees, or something. Not because they don&#039;t use your preferred wording for their advertisements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure. Even ignoring the point that groups such as the AFA are actually working against the spirit of Christmas by insisting on linking it with crass commercialization, it seems like a weak reason for a boycott anyway. It&#8217;s not as though the omission of the word &#8220;Christmas&#8221; is actively hurting anybody. Boycott someplace because they make use of sweatshop labor, or exploit their employees, or something. Not because they don&#8217;t use your preferred wording for their advertisements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara Michele</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2005/12/10/the-essence-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=60#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Yeah, is this getting silly or what?  Is Christmas really about retail?  Is this why baby Jesus came?  Somebody&#039;s missing something somewhere...

Thanks for pointing out the craziness.  Somebody had to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, is this getting silly or what?  Is Christmas really about retail?  Is this why baby Jesus came?  Somebody&#8217;s missing something somewhere&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out the craziness.  Somebody had to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

