<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Keep Him</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/05/05/you-can-keep-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/05/05/you-can-keep-him/</link>
	<description>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of an unnecessary blog, or prohibiting the free posting therein.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/05/05/you-can-keep-him/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 13:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=123#comment-734</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I&#039;m not actually a registered Democrat - I&#039;m unaffiliated. But I&#039;d certainly like to see a stronger Democratic candidate next time. Though I still feel that Kerry would have been a better alternative than Bush. You must admit that he hasn&#039;t set the bar very high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I&#8217;m not actually a registered Democrat &#8211; I&#8217;m unaffiliated. But I&#8217;d certainly like to see a stronger Democratic candidate next time. Though I still feel that Kerry would have been a better alternative than Bush. You must admit that he hasn&#8217;t set the bar very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyd</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/05/05/you-can-keep-him/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>David Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 12:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=123#comment-733</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Whatever the case, in the future, please be more careful about who your party allows to run for President.&lt;/i&gt;

And you all provide a better alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Whatever the case, in the future, please be more careful about who your party allows to run for President.</i></p>
<p>And you all provide a better alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/05/05/you-can-keep-him/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 02:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=123#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Sure, I suppose it&#039;s possible. However, it&#039;s interesting to note that the Republican-led congress has been and continues to be a rubber stamp for him. Maybe the problem isn&#039;t that Bush is liberal, but that Republicanism ain&#039;t quite what it used to be?

Whatever the case, in the future, please be more careful about who your party allows to run for President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I suppose it&#8217;s possible. However, it&#8217;s interesting to note that the Republican-led congress has been and continues to be a rubber stamp for him. Maybe the problem isn&#8217;t that Bush is liberal, but that Republicanism ain&#8217;t quite what it used to be?</p>
<p>Whatever the case, in the future, please be more careful about who your party allows to run for President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyd</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/05/05/you-can-keep-him/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>David Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/?p=123#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Perhaps his approval ratings are no longer in the 60s because he has made his base mad, not that his base is mad because his approval ratings are in the 30s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps his approval ratings are no longer in the 60s because he has made his base mad, not that his base is mad because his approval ratings are in the 30s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

