<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selective Outrage</title>
	<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/07/08/selective-outrage/</link>
	<description>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of an unnecessary blog, or prohibiting the free posting therein.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/07/08/selective-outrage/#comment-3220</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/07/08/selective-outrage/#comment-3220</guid>
		<description>I realize you're irritated by the Times, but what about the Daily News for leaking this story about the bomb plot? Should they be charged with treason, as you said the Times and the Post should be?

While we're on the subject, do you still feel that the Washington Post should be charged with treason even though our government said that their story about Rumsfeld and Cheney's homes presented no security risk, the information was already in the public domain, and the photographer had permission to take the photos used in the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize you&#8217;re irritated by the Times, but what about the Daily News for leaking this story about the bomb plot? Should they be charged with treason, as you said the Times and the Post should be?</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re on the subject, do you still feel that the Washington Post should be charged with treason even though our government said that their story about Rumsfeld and Cheney&#8217;s homes presented no security risk, the information was already in the public domain, and the photographer had permission to take the photos used in the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam W</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/07/08/selective-outrage/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/07/08/selective-outrage/#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>Were happy they were caught, not about the leak.  Rest assured, I am very very irritated with the Times for constantly printing information that may damage our national security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were happy they were caught, not about the leak.  Rest assured, I am very very irritated with the Times for constantly printing information that may damage our national security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.205 seconds -->
