<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Spamming NC Blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/</link>
	<description>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of an unnecessary blog, or prohibiting the free posting therein.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Not]Nathan Tabor</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19154</link>
		<dc:creator>[Not]Nathan Tabor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19154</guid>
		<description>Hey, it worked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it worked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19152</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19152</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

&quot;Are you a hypocrite? It would appear so.&quot;

No, I am simply someone who just walked in the door and is only now sitting down to edit and address comments on my blog. Perhaps you&#039;ll notice that I haven&#039;t posted or commented on my blog at all since before that comment was left?

Besides, you have a lot of nerve complaining about a joke post under your name when you were the one who started the very same thing in this very thread.

&quot;if you had half a brain you could figure out that someone is posting under my name&quot;

And if you had bothered to read the original thread and my first comments here, you would have seen that I was originally giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming those comments were left by someone posing as you. As I said in my first comment, &quot;Based on the comments at BoydÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s and WestmorelandÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m inclined to think that itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not actually Tabor.&quot;

But then you come along and in *your* first comment on this thread say, &quot;Yes, I am posting on all kinds of blogs these days.&quot; Which is, at best, ambiguous, and at worst seems to imply that you did make the posts in question. I have no idea why you would say something like that rather than, &quot;No those posts weren&#039;t made by me.&quot; We could have avoided a lot of back and forth.

Now the remaining question is who is posting under your name? Have you asked your friend Kouri about it? As I pointed out, there are a couple of comments on Westmoreland&#039;s blog that make it look as though it could be him. Plus, I&#039;ve also noticed that Kouri has been making very similar comments on behalf of John Cox. Maybe he&#039;s posing as you for some reason. Or perhaps it&#039;s someone else, for some unknown reason is posing as both of you. I&#039;m not sure which possibility seems more odd.

&quot;So, the question is do you do what is right or do nothing?&quot;

Do what is right, as I would have whether you had complained or not. Actually, when I first saw the comment I was simply going to delete it out of consideration for you. But I suppose I should just edit it and leave the joke intact. After all, I wouldn&#039;t want to be a hypocrite and handle it differently than I did the posts under my name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you a hypocrite? It would appear so.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I am simply someone who just walked in the door and is only now sitting down to edit and address comments on my blog. Perhaps you&#8217;ll notice that I haven&#8217;t posted or commented on my blog at all since before that comment was left?</p>
<p>Besides, you have a lot of nerve complaining about a joke post under your name when you were the one who started the very same thing in this very thread.</p>
<p>&#8220;if you had half a brain you could figure out that someone is posting under my name&#8221;</p>
<p>And if you had bothered to read the original thread and my first comments here, you would have seen that I was originally giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming those comments were left by someone posing as you. As I said in my first comment, &#8220;Based on the comments at BoydÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s and WestmorelandÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m inclined to think that itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not actually Tabor.&#8221;</p>
<p>But then you come along and in *your* first comment on this thread say, &#8220;Yes, I am posting on all kinds of blogs these days.&#8221; Which is, at best, ambiguous, and at worst seems to imply that you did make the posts in question. I have no idea why you would say something like that rather than, &#8220;No those posts weren&#8217;t made by me.&#8221; We could have avoided a lot of back and forth.</p>
<p>Now the remaining question is who is posting under your name? Have you asked your friend Kouri about it? As I pointed out, there are a couple of comments on Westmoreland&#8217;s blog that make it look as though it could be him. Plus, I&#8217;ve also noticed that Kouri has been making very similar comments on behalf of John Cox. Maybe he&#8217;s posing as you for some reason. Or perhaps it&#8217;s someone else, for some unknown reason is posing as both of you. I&#8217;m not sure which possibility seems more odd.</p>
<p>&#8220;So, the question is do you do what is right or do nothing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do what is right, as I would have whether you had complained or not. Actually, when I first saw the comment I was simply going to delete it out of consideration for you. But I suppose I should just edit it and leave the joke intact. After all, I wouldn&#8217;t want to be a hypocrite and handle it differently than I did the posts under my name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Tabor</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19137</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Tabor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19137</guid>
		<description>PotatoStew - do you know why I don&#039;t answer your questions?  take the comment two up - you correct when I post under your name - however, you don&#039;t correct when someone posts under my name.  Are you a hypocrite?  It would appear so. 

no offense - but if you had half a brain you could figure out that someone is posting under my name - http://davidboyd.org/posts/1159407038.shtml#2535 - I address it here.

So, the question is do you do what is right or do nothing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PotatoStew &#8211; do you know why I don&#8217;t answer your questions?  take the comment two up &#8211; you correct when I post under your name &#8211; however, you don&#8217;t correct when someone posts under my name.  Are you a hypocrite?  It would appear so. </p>
<p>no offense &#8211; but if you had half a brain you could figure out that someone is posting under my name &#8211; <a href="http://davidboyd.org/posts/1159407038.shtml#2535" rel="nofollow">http://davidboyd.org/posts/1159407038.shtml#2535</a> &#8211; I address it here.</p>
<p>So, the question is do you do what is right or do nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk D.</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19114</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19114</guid>
		<description>Yep, that made things clear as mud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that made things clear as mud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Not] Nathan Tabor</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19092</link>
		<dc:creator>[Not] Nathan Tabor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19092</guid>
		<description>Okay, let me clear this up. I am visiting with my very special friend Kouri in NJ. That&#039;s why some of my comments appear to be coming from Kouri&#039;s accounts. Now, if you don&#039;t mind, we have some man-loving to get to. 

Oh, yeah, I almost forgot: Fred Smith, Fred Smith, Fred Smith -- he&#039;s dreamy too.

(Edit: another bogus post, reattributed since it&#039;s not actually from Tabor. -PS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, let me clear this up. I am visiting with my very special friend Kouri in NJ. That&#8217;s why some of my comments appear to be coming from Kouri&#8217;s accounts. Now, if you don&#8217;t mind, we have some man-loving to get to. </p>
<p>Oh, yeah, I almost forgot: Fred Smith, Fred Smith, Fred Smith &#8212; he&#8217;s dreamy too.</p>
<p>(Edit: another bogus post, reattributed since it&#8217;s not actually from Tabor. -PS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19059</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19059</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s definietly spam, with the persistent, tangential references to Smith. As for answering my questions, no, he really hasn&#039;t done so yet. The only private email was after his first comment here - I emailed him to ask if he did in fact post the comment, and he said that he did.

I originally was pretty sure the Smith comments were not posted by Tabor, because of his denial on Boyd&#039;s site. However, his first comment here makes it much more ambiguous - at the very least he doesn&#039;t seem at all concerned anymore with the idea that someone may be impersonating him.  It would be nice if Nathan would just clearly state whether or not he&#039;s been posting any of the Fred Smith comments around the blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s definietly spam, with the persistent, tangential references to Smith. As for answering my questions, no, he really hasn&#8217;t done so yet. The only private email was after his first comment here &#8211; I emailed him to ask if he did in fact post the comment, and he said that he did.</p>
<p>I originally was pretty sure the Smith comments were not posted by Tabor, because of his denial on Boyd&#8217;s site. However, his first comment here makes it much more ambiguous &#8211; at the very least he doesn&#8217;t seem at all concerned anymore with the idea that someone may be impersonating him.  It would be nice if Nathan would just clearly state whether or not he&#8217;s been posting any of the Fred Smith comments around the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Not]Kirk D.</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19050</link>
		<dc:creator>[Not]Kirk D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19050</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that he didn&#039;t answer one of your questions (unless he&#039;s doing so privately via email). That has &#039;fishy&#039; written all over it. Definately seems to be a case of impersonation or spam however. The constant references to Smith clinch it in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that he didn&#8217;t answer one of your questions (unless he&#8217;s doing so privately via email). That has &#8216;fishy&#8217; written all over it. Definately seems to be a case of impersonation or spam however. The constant references to Smith clinch it in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19043</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19043</guid>
		<description>Lex:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/14/seas-of-fire-lakes-of-blood-earthquakes-volcanoes-cats-and-dogs-living-together/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt;? He does indeed mention Smith in his comment. Or is there another recent one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/14/seas-of-fire-lakes-of-blood-earthquakes-volcanoes-cats-and-dogs-living-together/#comments" rel="nofollow">This post</a>? He does indeed mention Smith in his comment. Or is there another recent one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Not]PotatoStew</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19031</link>
		<dc:creator>[Not]PotatoStew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19031</guid>
		<description>Well, this whole spam thing -- definition of spam: anything I don&#039;t like reading on a blog -- is revealing three things: First, Nathan Tabor likes Sen. Fred Smith; b) I need to get a life; and three, I need to get a life.

My own self-importance is astounding.

(Edit: Above comment is also (obviously) not actually posted by me... someone doesn&#039;t seem to be too happy about the questions this incident is raising. Name edited for clarity. -PS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this whole spam thing &#8212; definition of spam: anything I don&#8217;t like reading on a blog &#8212; is revealing three things: First, Nathan Tabor likes Sen. Fred Smith; b) I need to get a life; and three, I need to get a life.</p>
<p>My own self-importance is astounding.</p>
<p>(Edit: Above comment is also (obviously) not actually posted by me&#8230; someone doesn&#8217;t seem to be too happy about the questions this incident is raising. Name edited for clarity. -PS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-19028</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pleadthefirst.com/2006/12/17/republicans-spamming-nc-blogs/#comment-19028</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Nathan Tabor, or &quot;Nathan Tabor,&quot; has commented at my blog recently, but he didn&#039;t plug Fred Smith (or anyone else) when he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Nathan Tabor, or &#8220;Nathan Tabor,&#8221; has commented at my blog recently, but he didn&#8217;t plug Fred Smith (or anyone else) when he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

