Nathan Tabor, a North Carolina political activist and contributing editor at The Conservative Voice, recently tried to take “the liberals” to task on the subject of prayer. Unfortunately, his arguments are a little long on rhetoric, and a little short on support. A few highlights:
To hear liberals tell it, George W. Bush doesn’t have a prayer of succeeding. What with the war in Iraq, soaring gasoline prices, and the high cost of medical care, the President’s critics dismiss him on good days as ineffectual…on bad days as a dunce.
Yet, the President, with his cockeyed optimism and can-do American spirit, seems to believe he can and will succeed. And he believes that much of the credit can be attributed to prayer.
You see, this is a praying President. Maybe that’s why he catches so much flack from the media elite, who never met a praying man that they liked.
I’m not sure who the “media elite” are, but I know that there have been many positive stories about “praying men” in the media over the years, including Billy Graham and Pope John Paul II. There are plenty of other potential reasons for Bush to catch flack other than his propensity for prayer.
In fact, this President was bold enough to say that prayer is the greatest gift a citizen can offer him. Not a vote. Not a contribution to the Republican Party. Prayer.
I’m not sure how this qualifies as bold, considering that 82 percent of U.S. adults pray during a given week, and considering that the comment was made during his speech given for the National Day of Prayer. Bush may be a bit tone deaf and out of step on occasion, but I think even he can see it’s better to talk up “prayer” instead of “votes” or “contributions” on the National Day of Prayer.
Yet, this is not a President who is commanding people to pray—as some on the left would have you believe.
More vague generalizations. Who on the left has said this?
Unfortunately, for many of us, the National Day of Prayer is a national day of regret. This is because we are not really free to pray at times in the land of the free. For instance, our children are banned from offering an earnest prayer at school—where prayer is often needed the most.
Here Tabor’s argument really goes out into left field. Children are not banned from offering prayers at school. Our Constitution protects our right to pray wherever we want, be it in school, in a church or in a park. Tabor makes it sound as though a poor third grader saying grace quietly at lunch time is going to be disciplined, and that’s certainly not the case. To be sure, there have been instances where an overzealous teacher or administrator has overstepped his bounds, but you would be hard pressed to find a case where a court had upheld such an action.
A number of liberals would like to shut down churches where pastors are bold enough to dare speak against modern-day ills such as abortion, the break-up of the family, and pornography. They claim such clergymen are venturing into the religious no-man’s land of politics.
Again, what liberals have called for this?
Even if you can scrounge up a few people who happen to be liberal and are guilty of the offenses Tabor lists, that hardly warrants painting that whole side of the political spectrum with the same broad brush. After all, there are conservatives who want to forcibly convert people to Christianity and indiscriminately bomb Arab nations with nuclear warheads. Does that mean that “conservatives” as a whole are calling for such actions?